“對垃圾食品說不”

　　Walking along the street, it could be easily observed that youngsters tend to visit fastfood stalls selling burgers and soft drinks or street stalls selling curry fishballs. They simply prefer them to traditional meals or even healthy meals. Besides the low nutrition value and lack of fibres from green vegetables, vast amounts of fat, particularly trans fat, starts alarming the public. In response to the government’s promotion on healthy diet, our tuck shop has been told not to sell ‘junk food’. However, parents, teachers and students take on quite different views and, consequently, they seem not to have reached any compromises yet.

　　Although parents and teachers seem to be on the same side, their interrelational effects are quite subtle. Teachers are indeed caught in a dilemma. On the one hand, they have the responsibility to take care of their students’ health as professional educators. On the other hand, they could be in trouble if some students accused them for ignoring students’ right to choose. Balancing the pros and cons, of course the school put the students’ welfare first. This can also be seen as a boon to the society because improving the health standard of students today means relieving society’s medical burden in future. Last, but not least, schools are committed to providing students with the right value instead of fulfilling their every request.

　　From parents’ viewpoint, the opinions could be quite divided. The majority would consider the ban on junk food at school as a blessing. Some may be misled by the shocking adverse effects greatly exaggerated by the media. Despite the fact that cancer, heart attack, coronary disease and obesity are developed if – and only if – one takes in food with high fat content and low nutrition value constantly over a long time in vast amounts, parents often receive a distorted view: they think not only junk food, but other unhealthy snacks should be banned. They think the school has not yet got the job done. Some may think the reason they send their kids to school is to ‘enjoy’ school life, but not to ‘suffer’. They are the ones who put kids’ happiness at the first place. These polarized views could slow down the discussion considerably. Ignorant parents may even think schools should solely shoulder the responsibility.

　　Students are the recipients of the service. They are of course the major critics of the idea. No matter what their views towards junk food are, they would not welcome the idea of having their choices reduced. For the junk food supporters, obviously they are the major victims, since they will not stop consuming junk food even if they are asked to. The lack of students’ support puts students and teachers in different ends and they lack mutual understanding.

　　Concerning this issue, parents should understand the school’s standpoint and act as a bridge between the school and students. Parents could start the practice at home and make sure the students understand the meaning of the policy. Students should be made willing to support the school, instead of being forced to. The school should explicitly point out the dark side of junk food so that the students can understand why they should not eat it, instead of restricting them. This may be a counterproductive way because the students may even take in more junk food in their leisure time. Never will the school succeed if she works alone. It is high time the school allied with parents to give the students a healthy future.

　　沿著大街行走,可以很方便地觀察到年輕人打算去參觀小吃小攤,賣漢堡和軟飲料或街頭小攤,賣著咖喱fishballs。他們只是喜歡他們傳統(tǒng)的飯菜和甚至健康的飯菜。除了低營養(yǎng)價值和缺乏纖維從綠色蔬菜,大量的脂肪,尤其是反式脂肪,開始令人擔(dān)憂的公眾。在回應(yīng)的政府的促進(jìn)健康的節(jié)食,我們的塔克商店已被告知不要賣“垃圾食品”。然而,家長、老師和學(xué)生們選擇完全不同的觀點,因此,他們似乎并沒有達(dá)成任何妥協(xié)呢。

　　盡管父母和老師似乎是站在同一邊,他們的interrelational效應(yīng)是相當(dāng)敏感。老師確實陷入進(jìn)退兩難的境地。一方面,他們有責(zé)任照顧他們的學(xué)生健康以及專業(yè)的教育工作者。另一方面,他們將會很麻煩,如果一些學(xué)生被他們忽視學(xué)生的選擇權(quán)利。平衡利弊,當(dāng)然學(xué)校學(xué)生的福利放在第一位。這也可以被看作是一個恩賜給那些社會,因為提高健康水平的學(xué)生在今天意味著緩解社會的醫(yī)療負(fù)擔(dān),在未來的。最后,但并非最不重要的一點是,學(xué)校也在致力于給學(xué)生提供正確的值代替履行自己的每一個要求。

　　從父母的觀點、看法可能蠻分開。大多數(shù)人會考慮在學(xué)校禁止垃圾食品的美好祝福。一些人可能會被嚴(yán)重夸大了這令人震驚的不利影響的媒體。盡管事實是患癌癥、心臟病、冠心病和肥胖是發(fā)達(dá)如果-且僅當(dāng)-你花在吃脂肪含量高的事物和低營養(yǎng)價值不斷在很長一段時間在數(shù)額巨大,父母經(jīng)常接受一種扭曲的觀點:他們認(rèn)為不僅垃圾食物,但其他那些不健康的零食應(yīng)被禁止。他們認(rèn)為學(xué)校尚未完成了工作。有些人會認(rèn)為這就是為什么他們送小孩上學(xué)的學(xué)校是“享受生活,但不要抓得“受”。而他們正是把孩子們的幸福放在第一位。這些極化的觀點將拖慢討論較多。無知的父母甚至可能認(rèn)為學(xué)校應(yīng)該單獨承擔(dān)責(zé)任。

　　學(xué)生大部分接受該服務(wù)。他們當(dāng)然是主要的批評家的`主意。不管發(fā)生什么,他們的觀點對垃圾食品,他們會不受歡迎的想法讓他們選擇減少。對垃圾食品的支持者,很明顯,他們是最大的受害者,因為他們將不會停止食用垃圾食品,即使它們要求。學(xué)生的支持的缺乏使學(xué)生和教師在不同的結(jié)束和他們?nèi)狈ο嗷ダ斫狻?/p>

　　針對這一問題,父母應(yīng)該了解學(xué)校的立場,并且作為學(xué)校和學(xué)生之間的橋梁。家長可以先在家修行,確保學(xué)生瞭解政策的意義。學(xué)生應(yīng)該愿意支持的學(xué)校,而不是被迫的。學(xué)校應(yīng)該明確指出黑暗面的垃圾食物使學(xué)生能夠理解他們?yōu)槭裁床粦?yīng)該吃它,而不是限制他們。這可能是一個反作用的方式因為學(xué)生們甚至可以吸收。

【 “對垃圾食品說不”】相關(guān)文章：

高中勵志作文：不要輕易說不11-12

和考試作弊說不_700字01-21

外公,我想對你說05-05

外婆，我想對你說05-05

我想對你說作文05-05

爸爸，我對你說作文01-24

媽媽想對你說作文01-24

對我自己說的話作文02-09

對自己說悄悄話01-06

同桌，我想對你說作文05-05